🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of countries are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a law lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," said one parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is largely occurring at the local level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to copy the Australian lead, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of the West, further nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and others indicate that governments around the world are no longer willing to wait for platforms to self-regulate.